1) Animal testing, a form of enhancing new medicine and killing animals is often regarded by others as "our only way of developing medicine." They see animal testing as an efficient way of testing products on animals, instead of humans. However, many of these people just focus on the FDA's approval. On the contrary, many people are extremely against animal testing, because of the harm and killing of the animals. For the truth, the humane treatment of animals is necessary for the fairness and well-being of our fellow kind pets. In this essay, then, the testing on animals compared to the lab testing of non-living organisms will show that not testing on animals is clearly the much more humane and efficient was of developing new information.
2) In the introduction to "They Say/I Say": the Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein provide templates designed to help writers understand the way of providing both sides of the argument. Specifically, Graff and Birkenstein argue that the types of writing templates offer strict guidelines to showing off both sides of the argument. As the authors themselves put it, "presenting ideas from the other side, as a response to a person or group." Although some people believe that using these templates do not help, Graff and Birkenstein insist that using templates makes a load of a difference. In sum, then, their view is that using templates make writing a paper easier and faster. I agree. In my view, the types of templates that the authors recommend help tremendously in the efficient writing of papers. In addition, it is more organized and helps a reader understand each position. Some might object, of course, on the grounds that there is no creativity. Yet I would argue that each writer provides their own type of writing in unique ways. Overall, then, I believe templates should be used--an important point to make given a persuasive topic!
No comments:
Post a Comment